<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NewsBreakers</title>
	<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/04/05/newsbreakers/</link>
	<description>Rory O'Connor's blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jenio</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/04/05/newsbreakers/#comment-1256</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/04/05/newsbreakers/#comment-1256</guid>
					<description>They who say this are confused themselves. They don't know first thing about democracy. Sorry for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They who say this are confused themselves. They don&#8217;t know first thing about democracy. Sorry for them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Larry McBean</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/04/05/newsbreakers/#comment-626</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2005 10:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/04/05/newsbreakers/#comment-626</guid>
					<description>No, it IS funny, maybe not to you, or any of the people you know. Humor is subjective, to the people that are tired of the same tired news rehashed day in and day out, it cracks us up. To the people that just want to watch their favorite reporter do another 2 minute remake of the newest incident of the lady with 200 cats, it would spoil it, and perhaps, not be funny.
Unfortunately, for me, I end up watching even more of the news, hoping, I can jump up off my couch pointing at my TV, and yell "The invisible suit!" In that case... who is actually winning?
As for the "15 minutes of fame "comment, the news reporter is consumed by their own "15 minutes of fame" THAT is all they ever think about, day in day out, how can they get a piece of that action, shame for those foolish people to deny that from the reporters, shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it IS funny, maybe not to you, or any of the people you know. Humor is subjective, to the people that are tired of the same tired news rehashed day in and day out, it cracks us up. To the people that just want to watch their favorite reporter do another 2 minute remake of the newest incident of the lady with 200 cats, it would spoil it, and perhaps, not be funny.<br />
Unfortunately, for me, I end up watching even more of the news, hoping, I can jump up off my couch pointing at my TV, and yell &#8220;The invisible suit!&#8221; In that case&#8230; who is actually winning?<br />
As for the &#8220;15 minutes of fame &#8220;comment, the news reporter is consumed by their own &#8220;15 minutes of fame&#8221; THAT is all they ever think about, day in day out, how can they get a piece of that action, shame for those foolish people to deny that from the reporters, shame.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pat McNally</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/04/05/newsbreakers/#comment-534</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2005 04:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/04/05/newsbreakers/#comment-534</guid>
					<description>Dale, you just don't get it do you? Do you believe that the very people they are sabotaging would cover their press conference? Or the news monopoly held by Sinclair would see Newsbreaker's story worthy of balanced reporting?? Of course not, get a clue.When a few control what is reported to the masses, as is the present case, American citizens should feel it their obligation to take back what is rightfully and legally theirs...the airwaves. Spit in the eye of pompousness....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dale, you just don&#8217;t get it do you? Do you believe that the very people they are sabotaging would cover their press conference? Or the news monopoly held by Sinclair would see Newsbreaker&#8217;s story worthy of balanced reporting?? Of course not, get a clue.When a few control what is reported to the masses, as is the present case, American citizens should feel it their obligation to take back what is rightfully and legally theirs&#8230;the airwaves. Spit in the eye of pompousness&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Ted Mc Allistor</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/04/05/newsbreakers/#comment-518</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 18:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/04/05/newsbreakers/#comment-518</guid>
					<description>Yeah, that's it,more liberals in the newsrooms will stop all these stories about cute walnuts...because, of course, that's not fair to the ugly walnuts. Maybe they'll find some forged documents refuting the existence of walnuts altogether, or stop receiving oral sex from Barbara Streisand long enough to do some hard reporting on why we don't have "free" medical coverage and "progressive" ideas about the treatment of criminals in truly modern countries like Cuba. I say a man in an invisible suit is worth a million Keith Obermans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s it,more liberals in the newsrooms will stop all these stories about cute walnuts&#8230;because, of course, that&#8217;s not fair to the ugly walnuts. Maybe they&#8217;ll find some forged documents refuting the existence of walnuts altogether, or stop receiving oral sex from Barbara Streisand long enough to do some hard reporting on why we don&#8217;t have &#8220;free&#8221; medical coverage and &#8220;progressive&#8221; ideas about the treatment of criminals in truly modern countries like Cuba. I say a man in an invisible suit is worth a million Keith Obermans.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Connor O' Flannery</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/04/05/newsbreakers/#comment-517</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2005 15:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/04/05/newsbreakers/#comment-517</guid>
					<description>If I could get flex-time, newsbreaking would be my new hobby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I could get flex-time, newsbreaking would be my new hobby.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
