<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mr. Inside Goes to Washington</title>
	<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/11/02/mr-inside-goes-to-washington/</link>
	<description>Rory O'Connor's blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Chase</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/11/02/mr-inside-goes-to-washington/#comment-67906</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/11/02/mr-inside-goes-to-washington/#comment-67906</guid>
					<description>I completely agree that Fitzgerald was just a Bush lackey.  There was no question that Cheney was guilty of committing treason for putting America's security at risk by exposing Valerie Plame.  The fact that he was never even brought into it, suggests another successful Bush cover-up.  I would bet on it that Cheney himself picked Fitzpatrick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree that Fitzgerald was just a Bush lackey.  There was no question that Cheney was guilty of committing treason for putting America&#8217;s security at risk by exposing Valerie Plame.  The fact that he was never even brought into it, suggests another successful Bush cover-up.  I would bet on it that Cheney himself picked Fitzpatrick.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Leisa Jamison</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/11/02/mr-inside-goes-to-washington/#comment-1033</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 22:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/11/02/mr-inside-goes-to-washington/#comment-1033</guid>
					<description>According to recent research, the age of special prosecutors, of course, began with Watergate. Since that time, a series of "independent counsels" and "special counsels" has left a trail of ruined lives but very few well-founded convictions for serious federal crimes. Republicans were thoroughly disillusioned with
the system by the close of Ronald Reagan's second term, and many
Democrats came to agree by the time President Bill Clinton left office.
The independent counsel statute was not renewed and is no longer in
effect. But the attorney general may still appoint special counsels as
an administrative act, and this is how Fitzgerald took office. He should be the last.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to recent research, the age of special prosecutors, of course, began with Watergate. Since that time, a series of &#8220;independent counsels&#8221; and &#8220;special counsels&#8221; has left a trail of ruined lives but very few well-founded convictions for serious federal crimes. Republicans were thoroughly disillusioned with<br />
the system by the close of Ronald Reagan&#8217;s second term, and many<br />
Democrats came to agree by the time President Bill Clinton left office.<br />
The independent counsel statute was not renewed and is no longer in<br />
effect. But the attorney general may still appoint special counsels as<br />
an administrative act, and this is how Fitzgerald took office. He should be the last.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: faith white</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/11/02/mr-inside-goes-to-washington/#comment-922</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2005 09:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/11/02/mr-inside-goes-to-washington/#comment-922</guid>
					<description>I am wondering how many of you commenting suspiciously on Patrick Fitzgerald actually saw or read the entire indictment?  Rarely have I seen such masterful staging.  Fitzgerald took every opportunity to incriminate the white house of corruption. He didn't just say Libby has been indicted on 5 counts of perjury, obstruction of justice etc. He made the case for Libby being a liar Get the indictment and actually read it, or watch the video.  You can not watch the man without coming away from it feeling that he has made a spectacle of what the bush chaney cabal has been up to. .  Fitzgerald asked to see precedence on Spiro Agnew. He is going after Cheney.  Based on what has been revealed, by Fitzgerald, the bush white house has been exposed. Fitzgerald has made it clear, he has found the filth and  he is going after it!  
It would be very powerful to start showing the video of the indictment all across the land.  There is much of value  in it that should not be allowed to be forgotten. Look closer at what the man has actually accomplished.  If Fitzgerald was a bush lackey, he would never have spent so much time making it very clear that he found much corruption.  It is up to us to capitalize on this portal that Fitzgerald has held open to the World view, into the filthy world of bush politics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am wondering how many of you commenting suspiciously on Patrick Fitzgerald actually saw or read the entire indictment?  Rarely have I seen such masterful staging.  Fitzgerald took every opportunity to incriminate the white house of corruption. He didn&#8217;t just say Libby has been indicted on 5 counts of perjury, obstruction of justice etc. He made the case for Libby being a liar Get the indictment and actually read it, or watch the video.  You can not watch the man without coming away from it feeling that he has made a spectacle of what the bush chaney cabal has been up to. .  Fitzgerald asked to see precedence on Spiro Agnew. He is going after Cheney.  Based on what has been revealed, by Fitzgerald, the bush white house has been exposed. Fitzgerald has made it clear, he has found the filth and  he is going after it!<br />
It would be very powerful to start showing the video of the indictment all across the land.  There is much of value  in it that should not be allowed to be forgotten. Look closer at what the man has actually accomplished.  If Fitzgerald was a bush lackey, he would never have spent so much time making it very clear that he found much corruption.  It is up to us to capitalize on this portal that Fitzgerald has held open to the World view, into the filthy world of bush politics.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Salient</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/11/02/mr-inside-goes-to-washington/#comment-914</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 17:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/11/02/mr-inside-goes-to-washington/#comment-914</guid>
					<description>Fitz has a track record of starting slowly w/ one or a few indictments, and then folowing up with more.

Let's hope that's what he is doing here.

Are we sure the the fed rules were broken when Fitz was selected? I'd like to here from a lawer on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fitz has a track record of starting slowly w/ one or a few indictments, and then folowing up with more.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope that&#8217;s what he is doing here.</p>
<p>Are we sure the the fed rules were broken when Fitz was selected? I&#8217;d like to here from a lawer on that.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: snoman</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/11/02/mr-inside-goes-to-washington/#comment-913</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2005 14:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2005/11/02/mr-inside-goes-to-washington/#comment-913</guid>
					<description>I'm so sick of self-styled "mavericks" who feel the need to shit all over every positive development against Bush&#038;Co. Does it make you feel more in-the-know to deride this investigation? "Inside job" huh? Oooo you sound so laconic and hard-boiled when you say this. 
And here I was enjoying the crippling fallout from Fitz' well-placed bomb to Libby's office. How naive of me to enjoy watching that indictment speed the unravelling of the web of criminalilty of these sanctimonious sh!ts.

But I gues you are much more in the know. after all, you have a blog. Keep attacking BUsh's adversaries..It makes you look fiercely independent and its easier and safer than actually going after the Bushes like, say...Patrick Fitzgerald</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m so sick of self-styled &#8220;mavericks&#8221; who feel the need to shit all over every positive development against Bush&#038;Co. Does it make you feel more in-the-know to deride this investigation? &#8220;Inside job&#8221; huh? Oooo you sound so laconic and hard-boiled when you say this.<br />
And here I was enjoying the crippling fallout from Fitz&#8217; well-placed bomb to Libby&#8217;s office. How naive of me to enjoy watching that indictment speed the unravelling of the web of criminalilty of these sanctimonious sh!ts.</p>
<p>But I gues you are much more in the know. after all, you have a blog. Keep attacking BUsh&#8217;s adversaries..It makes you look fiercely independent and its easier and safer than actually going after the Bushes like, say&#8230;Patrick Fitzgerald
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
