08
Dec
The News Outlet Store
MSNBC.
Misery. Stupidity. NoBody Cares.
That’s what the combined call letters of two media behemoths mean to the young worker-bees, the daily drones who schlep to Secaucus to grind out the endless ‘newsfood’ packages that substitute for real information at the 24/7 cable content outlet store on the wrong side of the Hudson.
At least that’s what the surf/cyber punks who daylabor there tell me.
But they’re cynical survivors, cranking out whatever crap the “Fat Man” (their moniker for longtime bigtime network news exec Rick Kaplan) tells them to. It’s just a gig to pay rent on the Rockaway surf shack, so what do they care?
They don’t. Remember?
Misery. Stupidity. NoBody Cares.
But I care, and you should.
All this and more came to mind recently, when NBC Universal announced it has taken majority control of the low-rated cable newser MSNBC, buying out the interest of its putative partner Microsoft. The new deal put an end to what trade journal Broadcasting and Cable coyly termed one of “the more strained partnerships in cable TV.” Less restrained observers — such as this reporter — have instead long viewed the cellar dwellers’ relations as more of, say, an “unmitigated disaster.”
MSNBC has never made even a dent in the cable news ratings, lagging well behind News Corp’s Fox News Channel and Time Warner’s CNN. It has, however, made lots of high-profile but ill-thought out attempts to make an impact with its programming, including shows hosted by Phil Donahue, former wrestler and Minnesota Governor Jesse Ventura, former Congressman Joe Scarborough, and not-even-former politician Alan Keyes. More recently, in a spate “If You Can’t Beat ‘Em, Join ‘Em” programming prowess, it has resorted to recycling retreads like ex-Fox News anchor Rita Crosby and onetime CNN bow-tied bad boy Tucker Carlson – with predictably dismal results.
While shedding its cable interest, computer giant Microsoft will keep its piece of the shared (and unlike the channel, extremely popular) MSNBC Website. Since the network’s launch nearly a dotcom decade ago, Microsoft has largely been a silent partner — other than shelling out about $30 million per year to prop up the disastrous cable co-venture. Having shed its other major media asset last year, when it sold its interest in online magazine Slate to the Washington Post Company, Microsoft wisely seems to be returning to its core business of dominating the Internet with inferior but ubiquitous software.
NBC will now have an 82% stake in the channel and an option to acquire the rest after two years, so the transaction puts NBC squarely in control of MSNBC for the first time. But given the abysmal performance heretofore, why should we expect anything different or better now that Bill Gates is out of the picture?
According to the New York Times, “executives within NBC complained that they did not have enough control of the network’s budget to hire the right talent and market its programs.” NBC News President Steve Capus, who also oversees MSNBC, explained, “Acquiring a controlling interest in MSNBC will allow us to fully integrate the channel into our News operations and our overall cable platform,” Capus said. He added that MSNBC “is a critical component of NBC News’ success and has made some key viewership gains in recent months.”
Capus failed to note, however, that it still ranks below the WPIX programming of a burning Yule log in the latest Nielsen ratings… At the risk of making sense, may I humbly suggest that there might exist some relation between the quality of the ‘newsfood’ NBC’s cable outlet has been serving up for the past ten years, and its historical paucity of viewers?
The point may be best driven home anecdotally. A few years back, a bright, energetic, idealistic and extremely promising young woman – a recent Yale graduate, in fact — interned with me. Unfortunately, when the internship was done, I had no job to offer. So with some trepidation she took a producer position at MSNBC.
Six months later when I called to ask how she was faring, she said she was going to attend law school soon. Why? Because she just couldn’t take the misery, or the stupidity, or the lack of caring, any longer.
“Here’s what my job entails,” she explained. “Every day dozens of ‘feeds’ come in from all over the world, from places I’ve never been to and don’t know anything about. Then I write scripts for packages based on those feeds, and then I edit them, and then they go on the air. I don’t feel like I can keep doing this any longer, in good conscience. So I’ve decided just to leave the news business entirely.”
With Microsoft out of the picture, NBC executives say they may now change MSNBC’s name. This is of course standard practice in the Land of Master Control, where the first decision every incoming news executive makes is to “Change the set!” But if Capus & Co. don’t change everything else about their beleaguered network, they’ll just be setting themselves – and us – up for another amusing, insulting, but telling, acronym.

















Still getting their stories straight
Rory O’Connor is hanging on to this story like a pit bull but DOD and DIA keep trying to shake him loose:
My quest began in September, when Hicks predecessor, Lieutenant Colonel Chris Conway, told me DOD had nothing on Able Danger and my querie…
December 9th, 2005 at 1:45 amI wouldn’t call it a ‘laissez-faire’ attitude — its precisely the opposite.
Thanks for your work, more generally.
December 9th, 2005 at 8:12 amExcellent reporting, Rory.
December 10th, 2005 at 8:48 amThis deliberate obfscation is no surprise from this administration, obviously the most deceitful and damaging administration in our history. Look at the record in terms of our economy, our freedoms supposedly guaranteed by the constitution, our ecology, our reputation world wide, our education, etc., etc., all going down the tubes.
The answer: A democratic congress elected in ‘06 and immediate impeachment of these dishonest, phony, uncultured baboons who are running things in Washington.
Gerry Long
December 10th, 2005 at 6:05 pmWas 9/11 Designed As The Pretext To War?
December 10th, 2005 at 7:09 pmI have suggested before that the invasion of Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Iran had been considered by the think tank PNAC. Zbigniew Brzezinski in his book “The Grand Chess Game,” also described Eurasia as perhaps the most critical strategic place on earth in terms of control of energy production. If these plans to invade Afghanistan and Iraq were in their advanced stages of articulations, it wouldn’t be hard to imagine, that when evidence surfaced of an attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, that there would be a strong desire to suppress the intel. Many times in the past when giant international banking concerns saw an opportunity to make billions off of money transfers in the build up to war, that just such convenient disasters were caused to set the war wagons in motion. It wouldn’t be much of a stretch of the imagination to envision that 9/11 was such a convenient disaster to set the current war wagons in motion. Consider also that our defense industry was stagnating before 9/11. 9/11 more than any other possible event put our defense industry back in business. And if this is true, and considering that Wolfowitz is now conveniently connected to big banking it wouldn’t be any surprise that all intelligence agencies would want to destroy or hide all pre 9/11 intel. Think of the money that has changed hands since 9/11, and then think about the interest on that money and then I think you can get a picture of why everyone is hush hush.
I could be wrong, but wasnt Able Danager first made public in the book Crossing the Rubicon: The Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil-(Michael C. Ruppert). Which by the way is a must read if you truly want to understand the connection between the black bag operation called “911″ and the illegal invasion of Iraq called the “war on terrorism.” All that with a mixure of Peak Oil and a grab for the last drops of remaining oil, to continue our lifestyle that we are accustomed to. When Peak Oil is finally realized by the sleeping public, watch out!!!! If you thought Katrina was a complete disaster… you ain’t seen nuthin yet….!!!!
December 11th, 2005 at 10:32 pmOne day it will emerge that US intelligence/security agencies were tagging Atta since shortly after the 1st WTC attack. Atta was known to be interested in freeing the Blind Shiek and I think his plot to highjack aircraft in order to ransom the Shiek was itself highjacked by “rogue elements” within the Bush Administration.
I further argue that the documents “stolen” by Sandy Berger from the Archives had links to Able Danger. The former Clinton Nat’l Security Director (preceding Dr. Rice) knew that when those documents came to light the Clinton Administration would be blamed for 9/11.
Berger and Clarke both claim they told Bush Administration figures about Osama bin-Laden and perhaps as “proof” of the danger he posed Berger and others showed them the Able Danger documents.
December 12th, 2005 at 10:44 am