03
Apr
Hands Off Jill Carroll
You’re abducted at gunpoint from a Baghdad street… your friend and translator is killed before your eyes… you’re held hostage in isolation for 82 days in rooms where you can’t even see outside and threatened with death. Finally, you’re forced to make a propaganda video, saying things you don’t believe in a desperate attempt to save your life.
And then, miraculously it works… you’re finally released, reunited with your loved ones, and finally feel like you’re “alive again…”
“To be able to step outside anytime, to feel the sun directly on your face, to see the whole sky.” As Carroll told reporters waiting for her to touch down at Boston’s Logan Airport, “These are luxuries that we just don’t appreciate every day.”
A happy ending, no? A ray of hope in an otherwise bleak landscape of war, terror and torture, right? Cause to celebrate and rejoice, one would think? Instead, inexplicably, despicably, Jill Carroll came under vicious attack all over again – this time by her own countrymen and peers, fellow members of the media.
The mugging of Jill Carroll by the pathetic likes of John Podhoretz, Don Imus, and the rest of their wingnut cohort from the right side of the blogosphere makes me sick. How dare these misguided, ill-informed armchair analysts unleash their barrage of criticism accusing Carroll of showing “too much sympathy for her kidnappers.”
Have they no shame now? They certainly should, after accusing the 28-year-old Christian Science Monitor correspondent of, at best, a ‘Stockholm Syndrome’ identification with her tormentors, and, at worst, treason.
After all, following an emotional reunion with her family in Boston, Carroll spoke of her loathing for the gunmen who threatened her with death “many times” during her ordeal, described her captors as “criminals at best,” disavowed a videotaped statement made during her captivity and another made shortly before American troops arrived to take custody of her, and denied allegations that she had refused to answer questions from the American military.
“Things I was forced to say while captive are now being taken by some as an accurate reflection of my personal views. They are not,” Carroll said in a statement released Saturday by the Monitor newspaper.
I wonder if Imus’s racist, homophobic and idiotic producer Bernard McGuirk would like to repeat his disgusting suggestion that Carroll may ‘even be carrying Habib’s baby’ now? [watch the video here]
Why couldn’t these fools at least have the decency to wait until Carroll was out from under the gun to shoot from their hips?
It’s a disturbing sign of our partisan-crazed media ecology that Carroll came under sustained assault from pro-war, right-wing bloggers and talk radio hosts who attacked her for stating – while under obvious duress - that she had not been threatened during her confinement, as well as for wearing Muslim dress and sympathizing with her captors.
Anyone with a brain – or even a heart – would know, as Carroll pointed out once she was free, that “Fearing retribution from my captors,” she could not speak freely, that “Out of fear, I said I had not been threatened,” when in fact, she “was threatened many times.”
What was Carroll’s crime? Merely this – she is a suspected member of “the liberal media” that hard-up, hard-core supporters of this illegal, unconstitutional and unwinnable war — from the White House down – claim is allying itself with the insurgents resisting America’s occupation of Iraq.
Of course, Carroll never expressed any understanding or sympathy for the insurgency. Rather she distanced herself from the sentiment, stating explicitly, “I abhor all who kidnap and murder civilians and my captors are clearly guilty of both crimes.”
“You’ll pretty much say anything to stay alive,” noted Micah Garen, a documentary filmmaker who wrote a book about his 10 days as a hostage in Iraq in 2004. Like Carroll, Garen was forced to make a video before his release. Political controversy and “media craziness” are two of the issues Carroll will confront in the coming weeks, Garen added.
His words were echoed by another former hostage, US Senator John McCain of Arizona, a prisoner of war during the Vietnam War. McCain said on Meet the Press that Carroll’s comments in the video should not be taken seriously. “This was a young woman who found herself in a terrible, terrible position. And we’re glad she’s home,” McCain told NBC’s Tim Russert. “We understand when you’re held a captive in that kind of situation, that you do things under duress.”
So why can’t the right wing chickenhawks understand that?
Take Action: Send a message to the Imus show regarding their comments on Jill Carroll.






The fact that Jill Carroll’s statements under duress conflicted with the right-wing narrative has really fed the rhetoric of these wingnuts. Of course, while they say that she’s perhaps committed treason, I wonder what they make of the act of treason that took place without threat of execution by Al Queda (or whoever was responsible for Carroll’s kidnapping): the disclosure, in Bob Novak’s column, of the identity of Valerie Plame?
Imus (too easy to take a cheap shot at the name), should take his head out of ‘is arse & have a look around where the view is unobstructed and the air is, how shall we say, better. Since that doesn’t seem to be about to happen any time soon, I hope that the audience in this nation doesn’t do the 180 and join him and his ilk.
Enough is more than enough.
Carroll has made a more recent statement, in which she makes it clear that she considers the persons responsible for her kidnapping (and the murder of her companion) to be criminals, regardless of their motivation, who deserve to be punished by law. Of course, she was reasonably certain that she was safe from harm when she made that more recent statement, so it is possible that she was expressing her own views freely at that time.
Doesn’t sound like Stockholm Syndrome to me.
Imus and his cohorts are a tremendous waste of money–or would be, if people boycotted the advertisers who sponsor his program and those of the other hate-freaks.
April 4th, 2006 at 11:43 amIt’s simple - you have guns pointed at your head and you’re being forced to say things against your will or they will kill you. Who wouldn’t comply? You can take your words back, but you can’t get your life back. I’m sure that in such circumstances, folks like spineless Imus would do the same thing.
April 4th, 2006 at 1:32 pmFirst, I don’t understand why the video of Jill Carroll that was taken by the kidnappers wasn’t accompanied by a statement to that effect when it was shown on our media. Of course she would say whatever they wanted her to; they threatened to kill her. Who can blame her, or claim that they wouldn’t say whatever they were told to?
The video of the Imus show clearly shows that Bernard McGuirk is making reprehensible statements while Imus is attempting to shut him up.
April 5th, 2006 at 1:19 amLaur, since you’re too polite to take a cheap shot a Imus’ name - allow me. Imus in the Morning? Yeah, I “mus” in the morning too, I just don’t spread it all over the airwaves for three hours.
April 6th, 2006 at 5:47 amUNBELIEVABLE!!! I just can’t believe that fellow “journalists” (puke) would fry one of their own like that. They probably would have done worse if they were in her shoes, like curl up in a fetal position and start talking baby talk which would have been an improvement to what they were saying on that show.
God love and bless, dear Jill, who has gone through a horrific experience… one which hopefully we will never personally experience. HANG IN THERE, JILL!
We don’t know anything about what goes on in the country or that war… only what “they” want us to see. We can’t judge. We certainly can’t judge people who go there to try and help.
I can’t believe the television station has allowed that episode and don’t make those monkeys apologize and suspend them without pay or something. Obviously we can’t change people, however, should people who are so backward, ignorant, and so on be allowed to speak on air??? Really!
So sad!
(I tried to send a message to the Imus Show, but since I’m in Canada, it wouldn’t allow me to choose appropriate address options.)
April 9th, 2006 at 10:36 am