02
Jan

Happy News Year: 2007 Media Trends and Changes

What changes and trends can we expect on the U.S. media scene in the coming new year?

First, it’s clear that at long last the tide has begun to turn regarding relations between a once-complaisant and complicit American media and an increasingly troubled and vulnerable Bush Administration. With blood already in the water — and lots more to come — watch for our previously timid mainstream media to morph into voracious sharks circling an ever-more vulnerable ship of state and its Captain Queeg-like commander-in-chief.

Look also for the early rounds of the 2008 Presidential race to come into increasing focus as the year grinds on. The media loves the new, of course, so expect a rash of optimistic and positive coverage of the fresh, dark horse (no pun intended) candidacy of Barack Obama — to be followed in short order by the inevitable backlash of cynical, negative stories, trumped inevitably by the Third Act of his re-discovery and redemption.

And of course there will be lots of dumb talk, useless analysis and thumb sucking about the issues of race and gender, as Obama and Hillary Clinton vie for the Democratic nomination for the presidency — and the media contemplates the possibility of either America’s first black president or its first female one. This will be followed in close order by a lot of cable chatter and opinion-izing about how Hillary must prove her manliness. At the same time, Barack will be forced to prove his blackness to black Americans while convincing white Americans he’s really one of them — and not…one of them!

Other sure bets in the coming media year include an ever-growing convergence of New Media and Old, and of the worldwide web and the broadcast world. Watch for the continued rise of citizen journalism, 2.0 social news networks like Newstrust.net and a growing reliance on user-generated content by the smartest of the Big Media Players. Those that embrace the coming change will prosper and thrive, while those that fear and filter it in a vain effort to maintain their control will trend first toward growing irrelevance, then to oblivion, and finally — dinosaurs that they are — to all-out extinction.

Expect longtime audience trends — lower ratings for television and less circulation for newspapers — to continue and exacerbate, as newspapers hemorrhage readers and viewers desert broadcast outlets and flock to the internet.

Expect also that television networks and newspapers will continue to respond by slashing news industry jobs — 44,000 already gone in just five years and no end in sight.

Finally, expect at least some of more of the same — more deregulation, more consolidation, more stupidification and dumbing down — and, of course, expect, count on and plan to wallow in — more Britney Spears, more Lindsay Lohan, and more Paris Hilton. Maybe next year they’ll at least be able to keep their knickers on, but who knows? In media world, some things never change. Happy News Year!

Share and save this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • BlinkList
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Rate on NewsTrust

4 Responses to “Happy News Year: 2007 Media Trends and Changes”

  1. 1
    Nilsa Garcia-Rey Says:

    Greetings Rory,
    Was glad to hear your comments on Here and Now–and that you’ve maintained your perch on the edge of truth, overlooking the lies below. Keep it coming.
    Nilsa Garcia-Rey

  2. 2
    Kathleen Galt Says:

    I should add that Amy Goodman of Democracy Now devoted her full program on Monday to the life and work of Dr. Martin Luther King. Amy is always on target. Thank you Amy!

  3. 3
    Judy Says:

    Re the 44,000 news industry jobs lost over the past five years; I would like to know the source of that number. Thanks. I am one of dwindling few still employed.

  4. 4
    Antibush Says:

    Bush goes ballistic about other countries being evil and dangerous, because they have weapons of mass destruction. But, he insists on building up even a more deadly supply of nuclear arms right here in the US. What do you think? Is killing thousands of innocent civilians okay when you are doing a little government makeover?
    Our country is in debt until forever, we don’t have jobs, and we live in fear. We have invaded a country and been responsible for thousands of deaths.
    The more people that the government puts in jails, the safer we are told to think we are. The real terrorists are wherever they are, but they aren’t living in a country with bars on the windows. We are.

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image


  • Recent Comments

    • Jim Philips: Who died and made these guys the normal police? Do you think any...
    • gme: O’Reilly attacking Kern the way he did only helps prove her...
    • Michael: Ive only just discovered Ms Ingram and I found her to be very...
    • Kate: Please, Laura Ingram is as phoney as her hair color. Power to the...
    • Dr. Robert Weed: Shock jocks .. Rush Limbaugh … Sean Hannity?? Maybe...
  • Archives


  • Shock Jocks:
    Hate Speech and
    Talk Radio

    Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio

    Written by veteran media critic and Emmy winner Rory O'Connor, Shock Jocks features unsparing profiles of the ten worst conservative radio talkers in America, including Michael Savage, Bill O' Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus and the rest.

    Click here to buy it! >>






    Member of Media Bloggers Association



    Books I Like


    Purchases help
    support this blog!

    • Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio: America\'s Ten Worst Hate Talkers and the Progressive Alternatives
      Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio: America's Ten Worst Hate Talkers and the Progressive Alternatives
      Author: Rory O\'Connor
      Rating: 5