30
Jan

Libby Trial 1.30–Post 1

Prosecution witness David S. Addington, whom the New York Times calls “perhaps the most secretive and publicity-averse employee in the White House,” continues his testimony this morning. Addington was counsel to Vide President Cheney at the time Valerie Plame’s secret identity was disclosed. He subsequently replaced Scooter Libby as chief of staff.

Addington has previously testified about a meeting he had with Libby between July 6-12, 2003, wherein Libby asked him if CIA would have records showing if someone had been sent on a mission. Having worked at the C.I.A. for years as a lawyer, Addington was a logical source of such information. He also supervised review of documents requested by the Justice Department and sat in on witness interviews.

Addington still seems predictably reluctant to be on the stand but is certainly responsive. He says that when the government went to interview the Vice President, Addington became aware that he too would become a witness. He subsequently was interviewed by the FBI and appeared before the grand jury and was questioned about his personal knowledge of the Plame affair. He had already attended other witness interviews and reviewed “hundreds of documents” concerning the case.

He says that Libby alone produced a large volume of handwritten notes, which Addington spent a lot of time reviewing before handing them over to investigators.

Defense then offers an exhibit of a handwritten note by Libby, which Addington had reviewed before turning over to Justice. The document is dated 6.12.03. It shows the phrase “CP-his wife works in that division.” Then it says ‘telephone-VP re: “Uranium in Iraq”- KristofNYT article.” Addington says he ‘drew no conclusions from the document.’

That “CP” refers probably to counter-proliferation,” Addington says. He points out that Libby also often refers to Colin Powell as “CP” in other documents.

Defense then shows Addington another document and asks about a ‘very short’ meeting between Addington and Libby in July 2003. They discussed whether the president had authority to declassify documents without going thru the normal declassification process. Addington – a prominent proponent of presidential authority — told Libby the president does in fact have the power to declassify any US national security secret at any time to anyone he deems fit.

Court in recess as of 10:30.

Share and save this post: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • BlinkList
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Netscape
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
Rate on NewsTrust

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image


  • Recent Comments

    • barbara reed: Pls. give folks Mayor BB’s address, email preferably, to...
    • Man With A Few Secrets: SPOILER Alert: Sarah Palin voted for Obama. And she...
    • Marpessa: I had just moved from London to Rome when I met Gil. He was then...
    • Louise: I long for the media of the JFK and Edward R. Murrow days when they...
    • Robert M. Cerello: Mr. Jones has perhaps written a classic overview of the...
  • Archives


  • MediaChannel Store



    Shock Jocks:
    Hate Speech and
    Talk Radio

    Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio

    Written by veteran media critic and Emmy winner Rory O'Connor, Shock Jocks features unsparing profiles of the ten worst conservative radio talkers in America, including Michael Savage, Bill O' Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus and the rest.

    Click here to buy it! >>






    Member of Media Bloggers Association



    Books I Like


    Purchases help
    support this blog!

    • Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio: America\'s Ten Worst Hate Talkers and the Progressive Alternatives
      Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio: America's Ten Worst Hate Talkers and the Progressive Alternatives
      Author: Rory O\'Connor
      Rating: 5