<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time to Cover Up?</title>
	<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2007/12/21/time-to-cover-up/</link>
	<description>Rory O'Connor's blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 17:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Deborah Marchant'</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2007/12/21/time-to-cover-up/#comment-67760</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2007/12/21/time-to-cover-up/#comment-67760</guid>
					<description>"Ego of the Year"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ego of the Year&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: yogi-one</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2007/12/21/time-to-cover-up/#comment-67698</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 16:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2007/12/21/time-to-cover-up/#comment-67698</guid>
					<description>I read that whole Time interview. You always know there's a lot not being said, and that the reporting itself is going to be heavily edited.

Everything is so politically sensitive in that kind of situation. Putin is a man who doesn't flinch over rolling a few heads, and he is under no obligation to Time. In fact, he did abruptly end the interview before the dinner they had scheduled was complete.

So you have to realize that Putin is parsing what he says to the American press, and then after that the reporters and editors parse through it too.

The reporters are under the gun, the editors are thinking about the political status quo as much (or more than) they are thinking about an accurate portrayal of the man, and Putin is only going to be candid to the degree he feels it furthers his own image.

So that's what you get. The prescription for the reader is to take it with a big grain of salt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read that whole Time interview. You always know there&#8217;s a lot not being said, and that the reporting itself is going to be heavily edited.</p>
<p>Everything is so politically sensitive in that kind of situation. Putin is a man who doesn&#8217;t flinch over rolling a few heads, and he is under no obligation to Time. In fact, he did abruptly end the interview before the dinner they had scheduled was complete.</p>
<p>So you have to realize that Putin is parsing what he says to the American press, and then after that the reporters and editors parse through it too.</p>
<p>The reporters are under the gun, the editors are thinking about the political status quo as much (or more than) they are thinking about an accurate portrayal of the man, and Putin is only going to be candid to the degree he feels it furthers his own image.</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s what you get. The prescription for the reader is to take it with a big grain of salt.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: vernonlee</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2007/12/21/time-to-cover-up/#comment-67572</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2007/12/21/time-to-cover-up/#comment-67572</guid>
					<description>Why are journos allowed to retroactively clean up their questions when they wouldn't (generally) do so for the interviewed subject.

Oops - except they do.  (Clean up Bush's grammar in quotes, that is.)

But if most subjects said something silly, the journos would have the right to leave it in.  But funny, apparently the rules generally work in their favor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are journos allowed to retroactively clean up their questions when they wouldn&#8217;t (generally) do so for the interviewed subject.</p>
<p>Oops - except they do.  (Clean up Bush&#8217;s grammar in quotes, that is.)</p>
<p>But if most subjects said something silly, the journos would have the right to leave it in.  But funny, apparently the rules generally work in their favor.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pocket Rocket</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2007/12/21/time-to-cover-up/#comment-67558</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 18:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2007/12/21/time-to-cover-up/#comment-67558</guid>
					<description>Putin was an interesting choice for PotY, but I don't think his selection really fit TIME's criteria.  Really, it should probably should have gone to Al Gore or Gen. Petraeus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Putin was an interesting choice for PotY, but I don&#8217;t think his selection really fit TIME&#8217;s criteria.  Really, it should probably should have gone to Al Gore or Gen. Petraeus.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: pace pace</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2007/12/21/time-to-cover-up/#comment-67549</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2007/12/21/time-to-cover-up/#comment-67549</guid>
					<description>To paraphrase the composer F.Zappa
"So then he Pooted forth a perfect green rosetta "(stone). (From Joe's -Stalin's Garage)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To paraphrase the composer F.Zappa<br />
&#8220;So then he Pooted forth a perfect green rosetta &#8220;(stone). (From Joe&#8217;s -Stalin&#8217;s Garage)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
