29
Aug

Big Media, Big Politics and Change We Can Believe In

Precisely four years and one month ago, after seeing an unknown state senator from Illinois electrify the Democratic convention floor with a keynote speech that set him on what seemed clear to me at the time was a direct path to the presidency, I wrote the following words:

“Last night, while the networks slept, the cynics wept and the future revealed itself. The occasion was the extraordinary keynote speech by Barack Obama, a formerly obscure Illinois State Senator who is poised to become the most important Democrat in America.”

I note this, not to break my arm patting myself on the back — others on the floor of the Fleet Center who heard Obama’s speech came to the same instantaneous conclusion I did:

“I’m not alone. Certainly the many hardened members of the media hunkered down in the press filing room watching agreed with me, unanimously, and that’s an unusually tough and unsentimental crowd to sway. Certainly my house-host this morning, who said she’s ready to drop everything and move to Illinois or D.C. or just about anywhere to work for Obama. And certainly Jesse Jackson Jr., whom one might expect to be competitive with Obama, but who gushed that ‘we always knew he was fantastic, but now all of America has seen what we’ve seen!’”

No, I look back only in order to look ahead, and to remind us that in 2004, as now, the mainstream media — which in covering the convention dedicated countless hours of airtime to self-congratulation and aggrandizement while ignoring most of the deep, meaningful political content and profound signals of change emanating from the convention floor – totally missed the real story.

In my post entitled, “Networks Sleep While the Fleet Center Burns,” I noted then, as now, that:

“Sometimes the mainstream media is so bad it’s good…Not good, of course, for the public they should be and often falsely claim to be serving, but certainly good for under-resourced sloggers and bloggers like yours truly, in that despite their massive technological and financial resource advantages, hundreds of employees, and “We Want to Own this Story” special convention sections, the mavens of the mainstream consistently miss the biggest and best stories staring all of us straight in the face. Case in point: The First Black President.”

And I look back to make a few necessary points about the corrupt nexus of Big Media and Big Politics, and the climate and conditions we face heading into our most important national election in decades.

The first is simply this: change is possible.

Obama’s extraordinary story—and the unprecedented speed of his rise to prominence — should be all the proof one needs… But if you remain unconvinced, consider as well another extraordinary speech, the one given by our last “First Black President” Bill Clinton at this year’s Democratic convention. As Paul Krugman noted in the New York Times, in Clinton’s speech “one heard the fundamental difference between the two parties.” And simply in seeing and listening to the man who spoke, as Krugman noted, “so eloquently , so seamlessly, that there was no sense that he was giving his audience a lecture,” one couldn’t help but reflect– what a difference he represented from the stumbling clown who replaced him! Was it really only eight years ago that our leader was clearly intelligent and articulate, the country was at peace, and we enjoyed record prosperity and a half billion-dollar annual budget surplus?

Change is possible…

After all, we’ve seen it with our own eyes. More important, it can and does often come in an astonishingly short period of time…eight years since Clinton left office…four years since Obama emerged from nowhere to radically alter the very possibilities of American political life…and in that brief time, we’ve moved to a leader who can barely think or speak, total, seemingly unending war, and record annual deficits and an economy in a shambles except for the fat cats who have been skimming the cream off the top for eight years as the rest of us waited in vain for a few drops to ‘trickle down…” As President Clinton brilliantly delineated, “Our nation is in trouble on two fronts: The American Dream is under siege at home, and America’s leadership in the world has been weakened….They took us from record surpluses to an exploding national debt; from over 22 million new jobs down to 5 million; from an increase in working family incomes of $7,500 to a decline of more than $2,000; from almost 8 million Americans moving out of poverty to more than 5 and a half million falling into poverty - and millions more losing their health insurance.”

Change is possible…. Figures like those underscore the change you can –and must – believe in, because it’s real. But it’s not too late to change it back

Of course, those who still rely on the media meant to serve them—but intent instead on serving corporate masters and boosting their own careers – might miss the possibility—no, the reality – of change. After all, despite ‘Flooding the Zone’ with literally thousands of reporters, they still somehow end up ‘Missing the Story!’ At Obama’s coming out, I wrote:

“The forty-two year old multi-culti pol with the Harvard Law degree and appealing, articulate manner would have stolen the show last night — had there been a show to steal. Instead, the networks took the night off, and judging from the morning coverage, so did the major newspapers, which trumpeted instead Ted Kennedy “leading the attack” (as the Boston Globe phrased it.)

The Globe and the Times, in particular, seemed to be drowning in minutia while “flooding the zone” with massive coverage of every possible party, personality, profile, sidebar, feature and folly, Meanwhile they missed the biggest story of the night: The First Black President.”

It seemed glaringly obvious that, “Twenty years from now — or less — we will all be watching clips of Obama’s keynote last night, as he accepts his party’s historic nomination. Shout Obama-Lama!” Little did I know that my prediction would come true in the very next presidential cycle,

Change is possible…

Ironically, however, it may yet prove more difficult to change our media than to change our politics.. Despite using our licensed public airwaves, Big Media feels no compulsion to serve the public — and so far Big Politics has let them get away with this anti-democratic rip-off.

So while it may be good for those of us adrift in the eddies of the Internet blogosphere. such as yours truly, it’s unfortunate for the public that the mainstream media is so bad. Because four years ago, when “the story of the night was the ascension of Barack (which means ‘blessed”) Obama — and Big Media, working hand-in-hand with Big Politics, missed the story.”

Let‘s not let them miss it again this time. Here’s the story – do what you will with it: Change is possible…but it’s certainly not inevitable. It’s in your hands now—not those of politicians and certainly not those of the media.

Post to Twitter

Share/Save/Bookmark

Rate on NewsTrust

10 Responses to “Big Media, Big Politics and Change We Can Believe In”

  1. 1
    kate orne Says:

    But will Obama be the leader who gets the job done? I have no idea, its wishful thinking at this point. In this country we don’t have much of a choice, its either him or “that old guy”…is that democracy? A sweet swede wonders.

  2. 2
    Sharon Tipton Says:

    Obama’s quick rise is amazing because of the man buthis commitment to end the war, to take us away from coporatism (he received $100,00 in campaign contributions from GE, owner of NBC and Raytheon - a military contractor). AND he voted for telecom immunity.

    If real change were to occur his record would show it.

    His rise is also due to his marketing - do you think HE DEVISED his slogans of change, etc? Maybe he did, but trust me, it went through the marketers (the same ones who sell us youth, shampoo and war). And sadly, a man’s charisma and brilliant oratory skills have sold alot of people to trust him. But it takes much much more to end our troubles in these critical times.

  3. 3
    Sharon Tipton Says:

    We DO have a choice - vote third party! Why vote for someone you don’t trust. There are candidates who are addressing the real issues and have real solutions. I’m voting Nader/Gonzalez and having a good conscience. Republicans are the way to fast track fascism, and Dems are on the slow track. I choose a real candidate - not one molded by the parties and their agendas (or the lobbyists, I mean.)

  4. 4
    kate orne Says:

    Nader, whom I personally adore, doesn’t have the $$$$$$ backing required, so I am sorry to say if you got no dough you ain’t got a chance. And if you don’t have a chance….well, you are not really a choice, right? I don’t plan on voting to have a good conscience, I vote because I want some change.

  5. 5
    Bill Says:

    Obama is a good speaker, as was Clinton. But I’m afraid that your attitude explains why the so-called left in America always loses: they get their pants all afire over the third rate. Ideas? Anybody — Kucinich, NAder, Edwards — had better ones. In any case, Obama will not win and it has nothing to do with change: Americans are racist. That’s the only thing his loss will affirm. No party whose president’s rating was so low could win, unless he was going against a black man.

  6. 6
    Irene S. Says:

    I’ll definitely vote for Obama, but even as I do I’m scared to death the Republicans already have plans in place to steal another election! They’ll tinker with the voting machines, or ‘cage’ the voters, or start another war that will scare voters into keeping them in office, or something……. I do wish we could rely on an honest election!

  7. 7
    clarence swinney Says:

    Democrats will not promo success I will

    google search
    clarence swinney
    + democrats 84
    + democrats create wealth
    + praise clinton
    + clinton vs reagan
    +carter vs reagan
    + reagan firsts
    + reagan scandals
    + how to identify a republican
    + bush lies
    + bush waffles
    + bush econovomits

    clarenceswinney@bellsouth.net

  8. 8
    clarence swinney Says:

    Simple Tax Facts

    Total National Income=10,000B
    Total National Consumer spending=9,000B

    Budget=3,000B

    Flat tax on
    income =30%
    on spending=33%

    Richest man paid 17% or a smaller percent than his secretary.

    Even he said it was wrong.

    Cut spending–
    Biggies :

    Defense
    Social Security
    Medicare
    Medicaid
    Interest

    OK you cut where?
    How much?

  9. 9
    USmoron Says:

    kate wrote:
    “Nader, whom I personally adore, doesn’t have the $$$$$$ backing required, so I am sorry to say if you got no dough you ain’t got a chance. And if you don’t have a chance….well, you are not really a choice, right?”

    US is a regime based on money and power, so military industrial complex, Roosevelt once warned of, is de facto the entity which hijacked all the citizen’s liberties and is rulling the country from the back seat. There is no way to change this, unless you change the entire system. The actors who played the role of presidents, are actors like Reagan, Szwarceneger, Ventura, or idiots like “W” sometimes, but puppets, or frontmen all the time. They are chosen long before you heard about them by this hidden government in the Bohemian Grove, as Alex Jones revealed.

    First move of these two party candidates is to put a letter to Jahve as Obama did at Wailing Wall and second to asure militarists that the wars for resources and strategic places on the Globe never ends.

    Good guys like Nader, Perot, la Rouche or such, have no chance in this electorial system which has 3 steps to asure that right (his) candidate who will serve the interests of the wealthy is put on the post.

    1. Huge amount of money needed for these unprecedent election circus running whole year successfully eliminates third party candidates from ,,nowhere”. In some European countries if you pass 3 or 5% margin in an election your party is financed from the bugdet so you have real choice.

    2. mysterious undemocratic system in which not simple majority counts, but electoral votes. (what the hell is this?) even Belarusia has simple and transpaent voting system.

    3. Diebold machines (nomen omen- Diabold =Diablo - devil) by them you can easily falsify any votes as you can, or put to prison blacks, poor, unprivileged if you a governor of Fla or any other state.

    4. occasionaly you can kill the guy if he is so stupid to act independently in the interest of the citizens or the country and not the group which put him in power as happened to JFK.

    So this ,,unseen party” of wealthy militarists, imperialists has two candidates pretending to be ,,voice of people” and masquarading as opponents same way as Pepsi claiming different taste than Coke.

  10. 10
    Rachel Says:

    I don’t know. If you look at Nader’s website they keep raising like $100,000 every three or four days from individuals. That’s pretty impressive.

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image


  • Recent Comments

    • Christain Louboutin: Although I would’ve preferred if you went into a...
    • Guy Montag: Amir Bar-Lev, the director of “The Tillman Story,” said: ...
    • Syl Reck: 8/24/’10 - I’m 80, an MSNBC junkie since the...
    • Audrey: Last week Pat’s mom, Mary Tillman, re-released her book Boots...
    • María Eugenia Sáez: Opium fields guard, hero Tillman, killed by...
  • Archives




  • Click Here to Book
    Rory O'Connor for Speaking Engagements


    Shock Jocks:
    Hate Speech and
    Talk Radio

    Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio

    Written by veteran media critic and Emmy winner Rory O'Connor, Shock Jocks features unsparing profiles of the ten worst conservative radio talkers in America, including Michael Savage, Bill O' Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus and the rest.

    Click here to buy it! >>










    Member of Media Bloggers Association



    Books I Like


    Purchases help
    support this blog!

    • Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio: America\'s Ten Worst Hate Talkers and the Progressive Alternatives
      Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio: America's Ten Worst Hate Talkers and the Progressive Alternatives
      Author: Rory O\'Connor
      Rating: 5