<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brands, Cesspools and Credibility</title>
	<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2009/03/10/brands-cesspools-and-credibility/</link>
	<description>Rory O'Connor's blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 17:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Tricia</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2009/03/10/brands-cesspools-and-credibility/#comment-71929</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 02:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2009/03/10/brands-cesspools-and-credibility/#comment-71929</guid>
					<description>Sounds like another form or censorship, and another way to limit freedom of speech.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like another form or censorship, and another way to limit freedom of speech.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Felix Polanski</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2009/03/10/brands-cesspools-and-credibility/#comment-71928</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2009/03/10/brands-cesspools-and-credibility/#comment-71928</guid>
					<description>Brand may work as a filter for a fair amount of news, but corporate ties to the political and global world often make the average news reader more leery of what truths aren't being told.  That's not to suggest there's some kind of global conspiracy, but to point out that news outlets rely too much on access over research, off the record as opposed to on, and unnamed sources who certainly have their own agendas for speaking...anonymously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brand may work as a filter for a fair amount of news, but corporate ties to the political and global world often make the average news reader more leery of what truths aren&#8217;t being told.  That&#8217;s not to suggest there&#8217;s some kind of global conspiracy, but to point out that news outlets rely too much on access over research, off the record as opposed to on, and unnamed sources who certainly have their own agendas for speaking&#8230;anonymously.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Public Takeover</title>
		<link>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2009/03/10/brands-cesspools-and-credibility/#comment-71927</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.roryoconnor.org/blog/2009/03/10/brands-cesspools-and-credibility/#comment-71927</guid>
					<description>Isn't the reason that there is so much "noise" on the internet because the brands have proven to be unreliable in the first place?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t the reason that there is so much &#8220;noise&#8221; on the internet because the brands have proven to be unreliable in the first place?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
