30
Mar

Media Mutes General’s Afghan Admission

“We have shot an amazing number of people, but to my knowledge, none has ever proven to be a threat,” says top American commander.

President Obama’s sneak visit to Afghanistan this weekend, although shrouded in secrecy, still received lots of prime press coverage.

At the same time, an astonishing open admission of possible US war crimes by Obama’s man on the ground in Kabul, senior American and NATO commander in Afghanistan General Stanley A. McChrystal, was reported by Richard A. Oppel Jr. in the New York Times… and then promptly ignored by the rest of the mainstream media.

“We have shot an amazing number of people, but to my knowledge, none has ever proven to be a threat,” McChrystal said during a recent video-conference to answer questions from troops in the field about civilian casualties.

According to the military’s own figures, American and NATO troops firing from passing convoys and military checkpoints have killed 30 Afghans and wounded 80 others since last summer, but as McChrystal noted, none of the victims proved to be a danger to the troops.

Despite new rules put in place by McChrystal, aimed at reducing the killing of innocents, such shootings have not dropped off. Although fewer in number than deaths from air strikes or Special Forces operations, their continuance, as the Times noted, “has led to growing resentment among Afghans fearful of Western troops and angry at what they see as the impunity with which the troops operate — a friction that has turned villages firmly against the occupation.”

These persistent “escalation of force” episodes have “emerged as a major frustration for military commanders who believe that civilian casualties deeply undermine the American and NATO campaign in Afghanistan.”

A case in point: the murder of Mohammed Yonus, a 36-year-old imam killed two months ago while commuting to a madrasa where he taught 150 students. As Oppel noted, “a military convoy raked his car with bullets, ripping open his chest as his two sons sat in the car. The shooting inflamed residents and turned his neighborhood against the occupation, elders there say.”

Although General McChrystal has reduced the number of civilians killed overall — deaths from aerial attacks, for example, fell by more than a third last year — shootings from convoys and checkpoints involving American, NATO and Afghan forces continue to plague the coalition. Shooting deaths caused by convoys guarded by private security contractors – not part of the calculation — make the total number of “escalation of force deaths” far higher than just those decried by McChrystal.

As noted by blogger Allison Kilkenny – one media observer who wrote about McChystal’s statement — what the general admitted to may be a war crime:

“Military brass and the warmongering elite usually skirt war crimes accusations by saying the Iraq and Afghanistan occupations aren’t conventional warfare. That is to say, the US is not at war with an official army, so anyone picked up on the battlefield (which is the entire world in the War on Terror) isn’t a POW. They’re an enemy combatant who does not have access to the protections afforded to enemy soldiers under the Geneva Convention.

This is a tricky way to circumvent accountability, but even this clever interpretation of international law can’t cover the stink of McChrystal’s admission. The US is occupying Afghanistan, and while there, they are killing innocent civilians, says the highest ranking military official in the country.

So, to recap: the President of the United States visits Afghanistan to deliver personally “pointed criticism to President Hamid Karzai in a face-to-face meeting,” after flying in “for an unannounced visit that reflected growing vexation with Mr. Karzai as America’s military commitment to defeat the Taliban insurgency has deepened.”

The president’s visit comes only days after his highest ranking military official confirms in the “Paper of Record” that his military forces have killed dozens of people, none of whom posed a threat – and other media doesn’t see fit even to mention that fact?

Post to Twitter

Share/Save/Bookmark

Rate on NewsTrust

5 Responses to “Media Mutes General’s Afghan Admission”

  1. 1
    Dorson Orba Says:

    It’s a darn shame that committing war crimes does not register with some people like the passage of HCR, which has caused some to go into a murderous rage.

  2. 2
    Dave Kisor Says:

    As an entity, Afghanistan never did anything to the United States to deserve that we have done there. Our being there was is strictly about an oil pipeline from Kazakhstan to the coast of Pakistan, nothing more.

  3. 3
    Frank Espada Says:

    I FAIL TO BE ANGRY ABOUT THE FACT THAT THE CORPORATE MEDIA HAS, AGAIN, BEEN COMPLICIT IN THE ON-GOING WAR CRIMES NOT ADMITTED TO BY THE TOP COMMANDER IN AFGHANISTAN, WHO APPARENTLY WANTS OUT OF THERE.
    WE NEED TO REMIND OURSELVES THAT THE MEDIA IS SIMPLY THE TOOL OF THE SMALL CABAL WHO RULES THIS COUNTRY (NO, I’M NOT A WING NUT), AND, AS SUCH, WOULD NEVER BREAK OUT A STORY OF THIS SIGNIFICANCE. THIS IS THE REASON WE NEED TO SUPPORT OUR BLOGGERS.

  4. 4
    Bill Murray Says:

    Our actions in Afghanistan are despicable. We are doing much harm to innocent civilian and are generating hatred for the US, not only in Afghanistan, but by countries throughout the middle east. We will never win the war there. Tribal, ethnic and cultural differences precluse it.

  5. 5
    Ariel Ky Says:

    Okay, so General McChrystal admits that U.S. troops have been murdering civilians. I, too, would like to know where is the outrage? Is this just considered business as usual?

    For any people of Afghanistan who might happen to read this, I apologize from the deepest part of my soul for what my country is doing to your people and the reign of terror that they are imposing on you. I would like to convey my deepest sympathy to the families and friends of those individuals that the U.S. has murdered.

    I am lighting candles and offering prayers for the people of Afghanistan who have lost their lives in this aggressive invasion of your country and for all of you who have been suffering as a result.

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image


  • Recent Comments

    • Hip Hop Clothing: Useful information, many thanks to the author. It is...
    • Nike Dunk SB: I was seeking this data due to the fact a prolonged time. You...
    • Nike Dunks: While this subject can be very touchy for most people, my opinion...
    • 抓姦: I really like the look plus the feel of this excellent template. You...
    • Joe Del: Good read! I 100% agree, the current technology available has...
  • Archives




  • Click Here to Book
    Rory O'Connor for Speaking Engagements


    Shock Jocks:
    Hate Speech and
    Talk Radio

    Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio

    Written by veteran media critic and Emmy winner Rory O'Connor, Shock Jocks features unsparing profiles of the ten worst conservative radio talkers in America, including Michael Savage, Bill O' Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, Don Imus and the rest.

    Click here to buy it! >>










    Member of Media Bloggers Association



    Books I Like


    Purchases help
    support this blog!

    • Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio: America\'s Ten Worst Hate Talkers and the Progressive Alternatives
      Shock Jocks: Hate Speech and Talk Radio: America's Ten Worst Hate Talkers and the Progressive Alternatives
      Author: Rory O\'Connor
      Rating: 5